Model comparison
Ministral 8B vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.5 to 12.6.
Side by side
| Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.2 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-10-01 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1202 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 11.1% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| DTBench | 45.7% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1417 |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1170 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1165 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1193 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1195 | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1161 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1212 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1175 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1166 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Ministral 8B better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Ministral 8B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.