Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Llama 4 Scout

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 41.0 to 20.2.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Llama 4 Scout specifications
Granite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index41.827.7
Released—2025-04-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1143

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Coding13961286
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Hard Prompts13741266
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
LMArena Math—1287
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Expert14061235
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English13401252
LMArena Chinese14141255
LMArena Russian13431263
LMArena French—1282
LMArena German—1272
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1207
LMArena Spanish—1278

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following13471248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query13591265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Text13611279
LMArena Creative Writing12881249
LMArena Multi-Turn13391280
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Llama 4 Scout?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Llama 4 Scout share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper