Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Llama 3-8B and 88.9% for Muse Spark.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Muse Spark specifications
Llama 3-8BMuse Spark
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index25.550.6
Released2024-04-182026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
LMArena Coding11521481
SciCode—51.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts11331474
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45152.04
CritPt—11.3%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%88.9%
LMArena Math11511455
ProofBench—17%
MATH Level 56.1%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
GPQA Diamond26.1%89.8%
LMArena Expert11131457
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English10981464
LMArena Chinese10761509
LMArena French11591497
LMArena German11041497
LMArena Korean10041459
LMArena Russian11091466
LMArena Spanish11731472
LMArena Japanese967—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following11271442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query11281451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMuse Spark
LMArena Text11661474
LMArena Creative Writing11501459
LMArena Multi-Turn11521477

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Muse Spark share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper