Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

37.8

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Sonar leads 31.3 to 12.0.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Sonar specifications
Llama 3-70BSonar
ProviderMetaPerplexity
Noometry Index28.537.8
Released2024-04-182024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215), Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1206—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284), Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1195—
DTBench54.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index122.91—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench—46.9%
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Sonar leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299), Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1218—
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1149—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1114—
LMArena French1231—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Russian1159—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233), Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1194—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
LMArena Longer Query1174—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225), Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BSonar
LMArena Text1221—
LMArena Creative Writing1210—
LMArena Multi-Turn1223—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Sonar better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.3 vs 35.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper