Model comparison
Llama 3-70B vs Nova Premier 1.0
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Nova Premier 1.0 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 33.8 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 35.1% for Llama 3-70B and 44.8% for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2024-04-18 | 2025-04-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 10K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $12.50 |
| Results tracked | 31 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |
Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | 44.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |
Math Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 35% |
| LMArena Math | 1218 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |
Knowledge Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | — |
| LMArena French | 1232 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |
Instruction Following Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | — |
Writing & Preference Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3-70B better than Nova Premier 1.0?
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Nova Premier 1.0 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.