Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Llama 3-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 23.1 to 12.8.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Llama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index28.829.7
Released2024-04-182024-12-31
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1206—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1195—
DTBench54.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench—22.1%
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1218—
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1149—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1114—
LMArena French1232—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Russian1159—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1194—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1174—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1221—
LMArena Creative Writing1210—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1223—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Llama 3-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Llama 3-70B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper