Model comparison
Llama 3-70B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Llama 3-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 23.1 to 12.8.
Side by side
| Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-04-18 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 31 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |
Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1218 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | — |
| LMArena French | 1232 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads
Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3-70B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Llama 3-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama 3-70B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.