Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Mistral

Mistral is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Llama 3-70B leads 62.5 to 52.6.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Mistral specifications
Llama 3-70BMistral
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index28.829.9
Released2024-04-18—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3122

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
LMArena Coding12061162
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Mistral: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Mistral leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts11951149
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
DTBench54.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Mistral leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
LMArena Math12181180
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
LMArena Expert11491125
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
LMArena Non-English11421129
LMArena Chinese11141109
LMArena French12321180
LMArena German11691155
LMArena Japanese10171013
LMArena Korean10171032
LMArena Russian11591168
LMArena Spanish12411143

Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
LMArena Instruction Following11941152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
LMArena Longer Query11741153

Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMistral
LMArena Text12211165
LMArena Creative Writing12101158
LMArena Multi-Turn12231147
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Mistral?

Mistral is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Mistral better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper