Model comparison
Llama 3.2 3B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Llama 3.2 3B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.9 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 24.7.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 23.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1098 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 28.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 21.9% | — |
| BALROG | 10.1% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 3B leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1095 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Llama 3.2 3B leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1126 | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.2 3B leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1090 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena German | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 949 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1089 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1100 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 3B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1094 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 595 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1105 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 3B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Llama 3.2 3B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.9 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama 3.2 3B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.6 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.