Model comparison
Llama 3-70B vs MiniMax-M2.5
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 39.2 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 35.1% for Llama 3-70B and 55.2% for MiniMax-M2.5.
Side by side
| Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2024-04-18 | 2026-02-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 31 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1381 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1387 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 68.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 618.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 42.7% |
| Cybench | 5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -23.16 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | 55.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1372 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | 146.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |
Math MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1378 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | 1379 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.1% |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1338 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1232 | 1362 |
| LMArena German | 1169 | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | 1171 |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | 1354 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1353 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1366 |
| CL-bench | — | 11.4% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.3% |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1359 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1364 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1361 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3-70B better than MiniMax-M2.5?
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3-70B or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and MiniMax-M2.5 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.