Model comparison
Llama 3-70B vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 12.8.
Side by side
| Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-04-18 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 31 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | 1396 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.93 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1218 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.3% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1232 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3-70B better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3-70B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.