Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Llama 3-70B

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 12.8.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Llama 3-70B specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
ProviderBaiduMeta
Noometry Index41.828.8
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2031

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Coding14551206
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14451195
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
DTBench—54.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.93
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Math14371218
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Expert14281149
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
MMLU—79.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Llama 3-70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English14361142
LMArena Chinese15121114
LMArena French14671232
LMArena German14601169
LMArena Japanese13821017
LMArena Korean14061017
LMArena Russian14461159
LMArena Spanish14731241

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following14131194

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query14221174

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Llama 3-70B
LMArena Text14451221
LMArena Creative Writing14261210
LMArena Multi-Turn14341223

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Llama 3-70B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Llama 3-70B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper