Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 999 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 976 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1026 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 980 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1024 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 952 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 978 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 988 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.