Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Llama 3-8B

Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 29 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3-70B leads 20.8 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 54.5% for Llama 3-70B and 36.9% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Llama 3-8B specifications
Llama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index28.825.5
Released2024-04-182024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%31.9%
LMArena Coding12061152
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%36.9%
HumanEval+72%56.7%
MBPP+69%54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Llama 3-8B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts11951133
DTBench54.2%43.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93116.45
ForecastBench57.158.6
WinoGrande83.5%75.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%

Math Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%1.9%
LMArena Math12181151
MATH Level 522.6%6.1%

Knowledge Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond40.6%26.1%
LMArena Expert11491113
MMLU79.3%68.8%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English11421098
LMArena Chinese11141076
LMArena French12321159
LMArena German11691104
LMArena Japanese1017967
LMArena Korean10171004
LMArena Russian11591109
LMArena Spanish12411173

Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following11941127

Long Context Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query11741128

Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text12211166
LMArena Creative Writing12101150
LMArena Multi-Turn12231152

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Llama 3-8B?

Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Llama 3-8B share?

29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper