Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Llama 3-70B

Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

24.9

Rank #339 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3-70B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3-70B leads 43.0 to 15.3.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Llama 3-70B specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
ProviderDatabricksMeta
Noometry Index24.928.5
Released2023-04-112024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1731

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-70B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding7761206
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts8041195
Epoch Capabilities Index88.94122.91
WinoGrande61.8%83.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
DTBench—54.2%
ForecastBench—57.1
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—

Math Dolly 2.0-12b leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Math8711218
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
MMLU26.2%79.3%
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1149
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multilingual Llama 3-70B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English8361142
LMArena Chinese8361114
LMArena French—1231
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Russian—1159
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following8141194

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query—1174

Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text8511221
LMArena Creative Writing8641210
LMArena Multi-Turn7401223

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Llama 3-70B?

Llama 3-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Llama 3-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper