Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.