Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Yi-34B
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 7.5.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1112 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1104 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1070 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1091 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Yi-34B?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Yi-34B better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Yi-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.