Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | 1264 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.