Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 9.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1494 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.