Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 33.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1204 | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1179 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.0 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.