Model comparison

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b Cohere

34.9

Rank #229 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.4 to 39.0.

Side by side

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct specifications
C4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index34.935.9
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.8 (#252), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Coding11601223

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 22.4 (#197), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11561203

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.3 (#203), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Math11681230

Knowledge C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.6 (#201), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Expert11531167
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.5%—

Multilingual Too close to call

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#242), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11801181
LMArena Chinese11811180
LMArena Russian11971187
LMArena German1188—
LMArena Japanese1120—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 60.1 (#253), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11551201

Long Context Too close to call

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#236), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11911205

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 39.0 (#250), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Text11851228
LMArena Creative Writing11681213
LMArena Multi-Turn11601227

Frequently asked questions

Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 8b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b has 15 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper