Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | — |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | — |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | — |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.