Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 43.4.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 35.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1223 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1203 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1230 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1167 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1201 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.