Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Meta
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1399 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1416 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1427 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-13B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.