Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 38.9.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
Llama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderMetaXiaomi
Noometry Index30.743.0
Released2024-07-232026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked4223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Coding12911476
LMArena WebDev—1433
WeirdML21.4%—
ALE-Bench—785.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), MiMo-V2-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12691457
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
Thematic Generalization—45.9%
DTBench61.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math12811447
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert12431478
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English12481416
LMArena Chinese12421456
LMArena French12791469
LMArena German12521417
LMArena Japanese12081366
LMArena Korean11841400
LMArena Russian12651427
LMArena Spanish12601457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12591445
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12661455
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text12841436
LMArena Creative Writing12621415
LMArena Multi-Turn12971456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper