Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Meta
UpstageSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 28.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1399 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1416 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1427 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 970 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1401 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-7B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Solar Pro4 share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.