Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 28.0.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1471 |
Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1442 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1454 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 970 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1408 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1445 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1411 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-7B or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Longcat Flash Chat share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.