Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

29.0

Rank #318 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Solar Pro4 leads 39.8 to 9.9.
  • Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 131K.
  • Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and Solar Pro4 specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
ProviderIBMUpstage
Noometry Index29.042.1
Released2025-10-022026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K524K
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.017$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.11$1.20
Results tracked818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
LMArena WebDev—1371
LMArena Coding—1437

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1399

Math Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%—
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1416

Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
GPQA Diamond28.3%—
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—
LMArena Expert—1427

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English—1361
LMArena Chinese—1415
LMArena French—1397
LMArena German—1364
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1382
LMArena Russian—1360
LMArena Spanish—1401

Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1377

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query—1381

Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro4
LMArena Text—1386
LMArena Creative Writing—1316
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1385

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Solar Pro4?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Solar Pro4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper