Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Molmo 2 8b
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.4 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1287 |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |
Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1276 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1270 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Molmo 2 8b?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Molmo 2 8b share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.