Model comparison

GPT-4 vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 10.8.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
GPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
ProviderOpenAIMeituan
Noometry Index29.142.1
Released2023-03-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$30—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked3819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding12541471
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, Longcat Flash Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts12411440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math12691442
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert12111454
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English12461404
LMArena Chinese12421465
LMArena French12831456
LMArena German12511408
LMArena Japanese12091373
LMArena Korean11841371
LMArena Russian12511395
LMArena Spanish12611445

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following12411411

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query12441425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text12631427
LMArena Creative Writing12441388
LMArena Multi-Turn12571418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Longcat Flash Chat share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper