Model comparison

Llama 2-70B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.1

Rank #343 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 41.3 to 7.4.

Side by side

Llama 2-70B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Llama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.142.5
Released2023-07-182025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked3525

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding10791441

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
DTBench41.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard64.9%—
CommonsenseQA 2.050%—
Epoch Capabilities Index113.59—
ForecastBench51.4—
HellaSwag85.3%—
LAMBADA78.9%—
PIQA82.8%—
WinoGrande80.2%—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math10911440
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250%—
Omni-MATH—46.7%
MATH Level 53.3%—
GSM8K69.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert10391416
GPQA Diamond26.3%—
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ88.6%—
MMLU69.9%—
OpenBookQA60.2%—
TriviaQA87.6%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10451407
LMArena Chinese9941461
LMArena French10891415
LMArena German10411416
LMArena Japanese9271398
LMArena Korean9641366
LMArena Russian10831403
LMArena Spanish11421436

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10711388
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10621403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text11151417
LMArena Creative Writing10751333
LMArena Multi-Turn10881415
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-70B better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-70B or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper