Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

23.9

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 58.2 to 13.9.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Llama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index23.942.5
Released2023-02-242025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked2125

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding6831441

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts7281428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index100.09—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math8381440
Omni-MATH—46.7%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
LMArena Expert—1416
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English8191407
LMArena Chinese—1461
LMArena French—1415
LMArena German—1416
LMArena Japanese—1398
LMArena Korean—1366
LMArena Russian—1403
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following7811388
IFEval—81%

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1403

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text8341417
LMArena Creative Writing7941333
LMArena Multi-Turn7531415
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper