Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

24.7

Rank #342 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 36.3 to 8.7.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Claude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.742.5
Released2023-07-112025-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked825

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding—1441
HumanEval+61.6%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1428
DTBench51.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.08—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
Omni-MATH—46.7%
LMArena Math—1440
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
GPQA Diamond34.7%—
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
LMArena Expert—1416
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1407
LMArena Chinese—1461
LMArena French—1415
LMArena German—1416
LMArena Japanese—1398
LMArena Korean—1366
LMArena Russian—1403
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
IFEval—81%
LMArena Instruction Following—1388

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1403

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
WildBench—80.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1415

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper