Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 30.0.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287), Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1471 |
Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333), Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226), Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1441 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1454 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274), Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1043 | 1457 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1086 | 1445 |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1046 | 1411 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1085 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-13B or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Longcat Flash Chat share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.