Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1299 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1298 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1289 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-13B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.