Model comparison
Llama 13b vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 35.8 to 20.9.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 13b or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.