Model comparison

Llama 13b vs o1-mini

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1-mini leads 48.4 to 13.8.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 13b and o1-mini specifications
Llama 13bo1-mini
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index24.434.0
Released2023-02-242024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
LMArena Coding6831362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Llama 13b leads

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts7281333
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58135.82
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
LiveBench—57.8%
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math o1-mini leads

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
LMArena Math8381358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
LMArena Expert—1316
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, o1-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual o1-mini leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
LMArena Non-English8191289
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Russian—1283
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following7811304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
LMArena Longer Query—1320

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bo1-mini
LMArena Text8341317
LMArena Creative Writing7941244
LMArena Multi-Turn7531314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than o1-mini?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and o1-mini share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper