Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.