Model comparison
Llama 13b vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 51.8 to 36.7.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1028 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1089 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
Multilingual Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 13b or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.8 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.