Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 5 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 31.6 to 8.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index24.929.7
Released2023-11-292024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding10961039
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10701028
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5—

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math11081089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—984

Multilingual DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10731000
LMArena Chinese11321016
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Russian—1004
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10791023

Long Context DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1092996

Writing & Preference DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text11051050
LMArena Creative Writing10671024
LMArena Multi-Turn1082989

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper