Model comparison
Llama 13b vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 43.0 to 13.9.
Side by side
| Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 23.9 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2023-02-24 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 683 | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.09 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |
Math Llama 13b leads
Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 838 | — |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 13b: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Llama 13b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 13b better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.2 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 13b or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.1 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.