Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 256K |
| Max output | 33K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.