Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3 14B
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 20.3.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 35.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3 14B?
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 36.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.