Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Qwen3 14B
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 24.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 35.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 14B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239), Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 14B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137), Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 14B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332), Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 59% | 64% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 138.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | — |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260), Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 66.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228), Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 63.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | — |
| LMArena French | 1301 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164), Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | — |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Qwen3 14B?
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen3 14B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.