Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Laguna M.1
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 37.9 to 21.1.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1349 |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Laguna M.1?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Laguna M.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.