Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen Turbo
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Laguna M.1 leads 21.1 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen Turbo?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.