Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-1.7B
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Laguna M.1 leads 20.3 to 15.4.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 26.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Laguna M.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.