Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 36.3 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.