Model comparison
Command R+ vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 25.2 to 9.2.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1291 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1272 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1295 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1247 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1252 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.