Model comparison

Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Laguna M.1 Poolside

31.9

Rank #252 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 34.9 to 20.3.

Side by side

Laguna M.1 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Laguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderPoolsideAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.937.7
Released2026-04-282025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output33K66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena WebDev13481275
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
LMArena Coding—1413
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProofBench0%—
LMArena Math—1364

Knowledge Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert—1337

Multilingual Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1345
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1394
LMArena German—1324
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1307
LMArena Russian—1367
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1356

Long Context Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Laguna M.1: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1356
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is Laguna M.1 better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Laguna M.1 or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 36.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper