Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.3 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.